Back to first pageBack to first page Centre for Artificial Intelligence of UNL
Browse our site
You are here:

Publication details

Publication details
Main information
Applied Logic without Psychologism
2008
-
Logic is a celebrated representation language because of its formal generality. But there are two senses in which a logic may be considered general, one that concerns a technical ability to discriminate between different types of individuals, and another that concerns constitutive norms for reasoning as such. This essay embraces the former, \ti{permutation-invariance} conception of logic and rejects the latter, Fregean conception of logic. The question of how to apply logic under this pure invariantist view is addressed, and a methodology is given. The pure invariantist view is contrasted with logical pluralism, and a methodology for applied logic is demonstrated in remarks on a variety of issues...[omitted].
Journal
Gregory Wheeler
Studia Logica
Springer
-
88
1
137-156
-
-
-
-
Export formats
Gregory Wheeler, Applied Logic without Psychologism, Studia Logica, Vol. 88, No. 1, Pag. 137-156, Springer, 2008.
<b><a href="http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/people/members/view.php?code=768e30c2109e32d4ad41104cf0167777_amp_cscd=d9c32a766467488f79625ce0e63b0917" class="author">Gregory Wheeler</a></b>, <u>Applied Logic without Psychologism</u>, Studia Logica, Vol. 88, No. 1, Pag. 137-156, <a href="http://www.springer.com" title="Link to external entity..." target="_blank" class="publisher">Springer</a>, 2008.
@article { author = {Gregory Wheeler}, title = {Applied Logic without Psychologism}, journal = {Studia Logica}, publisher = {Springer}, volume = {88}, number = {1}, pages = {137-156}, abstract = {Logic is a celebrated representation language because of its formal generality. But there are two senses in which a logic may be considered general, one that concerns a technical ability to discriminate between different types of individuals, and another that concerns constitutive norms for reasoning as such. This essay embraces the former, \ti{permutation-invariance} conception of logic and rejects the latter, Fregean conception of logic. The question of how to apply logic under this pure invariantist view is addressed, and a methodology is given. The pure invariantist view is contrasted with logical pluralism, and a methodology for applied logic is demonstrated in remarks on a variety of issues...[omitted].}, keywords = {Belief structures, non-monotonic logic, psychologism, pure invariantism, sub-System P logics}, year = {2008}, }
Publication's urls
http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/publications/view.php?code=350a680e256f1fe8a34b5bf9b390202a
[Currently not available]
Centre for Artificial Intelligence of UNL
Departamento de Informática, FCT/UNL
Quinta da Torre 2829-516 CAPARICA - Portugal
Tel. (+351) 21 294 8536 FAX (+351) 21 294 8541

POS_Conhecimento